Monthly volume: 100,000 USDC
Without MonBridge: Average slippage 0.5% = $500 monthly loss
With MonBridge: Average slippage 0.1% = $100 monthly loss
Savings: $400/month from reduced slippage
Even accounting for 0.1% fee = $100
Net savings: $300/month (7.5% of volume)
Trade: 100M USDC → DAI
Without MonBridge:
- Single venue: ~5% slippage = $5M loss
- Manual splitting: Complex, time-consuming
With MonBridge:
- Automatic optimal split across 4 venues
- Average slippage: 0.3% = $300K loss
- Savings: $4.7M per trade
Daily trades: 100
Daily savings: $470M
Annual savings: $117.5B
Portfolio Rebalancing: Move positions across tokens
Traditional: Manual routing through best venues = 0.5% cost
MonBridge: Automatic optimal routing = 0.1% cost
Per rebalancing savings: 0.4% of volume
Annual rebalancing: $1B portfolio
Annual savings: $4M
Strategy: USDC → ETH → SHIB → LINK → USDC (arbitrage loop)
Without MonBridge:
Manual path analysis:
- USDC → ETH direct vs USDC → DAI → ETH
- ETH → SHIB direct vs ETH → USDC → SHIB
- Etc.
Hours of analysis required, complex
With MonBridge:
- Specify: USDC → SHIB → LINK → USDC
- MonBridge calculates optimal path
- Executes automatically
- Seconds instead of hours
MonBridge integrates multiple venues
Users access Protocol X through MonBridge
When Protocol X has best pricing for a trade pair:
- User routed through Protocol X
- Protocol X gets volume
- Better execution incentivizes users
Result: Win-win partnership
DApp Code:
import { MonBridgeRouter } from 'monbridge-sdk'
async function userSwap(inputToken, outputToken, amount) {
const route = await MonBridgeRouter.findBestRoute(
inputToken,
outputToken,
amount
)
return await executeSwap(route)
}
Benefits:
- One integration covers all DEX venues
- Automatic optimization
- Reduced development time
- Reliable, audited code
Migration: Ethereum → Polygon
1. User has USDC on Ethereum
2. Bridge to Polygon (loses time/cost)
3. Needs better pricing on Polygon
With MonBridge on both chains:
- Best Ethereum exit pricing
- Optimal route to USDC on Polygon
- Seamless migration experience
MonBridge's routing algorithm:
1. Queries all integrated venues
2. If Emerging DEX has best price
3. Routes volume there automatically
Result:
- Without MonBridge: 100 users
- With MonBridge: 1000+ users routed to venue when optimal
- Volume increases 10x purely from algorithmic routing
Mechanism: Quality attracts volume through aggregation
Traditional aggregator: "Use our custom routing (biased toward affiliates)"
MonBridge: "Pure algorithmic routing to best price"
For established DEX:
- If they have best price: Get volume
- If they don't: Routed to better venue
- Competition on quality not politics
Result: Establishes DEX as reliable venue
Attracts quality-conscious traders
Without MonBridge:
- Uniswap gets 100K swaps daily
- Curve gets 50K swaps daily
- Sushiswap gets 30K swaps daily
(Fragmented liquidity)
With MonBridge:
- Best prices for each pair routed to highest-liquidity venue
- Venues with better pricing get more volume
- Incentivizes LP participation
LP Benefit:
- Better venues attract more capital (better returns)
- Capital efficiency improved through aggregation
Capital allocation strategy:
- Allocate 50% to high-fee-tier Uniswap V3 (volatile pairs)
- Allocate 30% to Curve (stablecoin pairs)
- Allocate 20% to Sushiswap (alternative tokens)
MonBridge routing:
- Routes trades to venues where LP has positioned capital
- LP earns fees proportional to capital deployed
- Algorithmic routing rewards quality positioning
Result: LP earns fees from better capital allocation
Volatile Market Scenario:
Volatility spikes rapidly
Slippage limit set to 1% becomes obsolete
MonBridge handles:
1. Dynamic slippage calculation
2. Impact-responsive pricing
3. TWAP validation
4. Automatic split execution
User feels safe: "MonBridge will protect me"
Rebalancing: Move $50M across 5 tokens
Fractional execution:
- Split each leg across optimal venues
- Execute rebalancing over multiple blocks
- Minimize market impact
- Transparent price improvement tracking
Cost reduction: 2% → 0.2% slippage
On-chain transaction data from MonBridge:
- Every swap: (input, output, venue, slippage, price impact)
- 100% transparent historical record
- Queryable by anyone
Research possibilities:
- Pricing efficiency across venues
- Market maker behavior
- Volatility patterns
- Flash loan attack detection
Value: Public research infrastructure
Infrastructure use:
- Validators routing user swaps
- Need best-price aggregation for users
- MonBridge provides public good
Incentive alignment:
- Better execution = happier users
- Happier users = more fees to infrastructure
- Virtuous cycle
Treasury: 100,000 tokens across 10 types
Quarterly rebalancing needed
Without MonBridge:
Manual routing: 0.5% slippage cost
Cost per rebalancing: $50,000
Annual cost: $200,000
With MonBridge:
Automatic routing: 0.1% slippage
Cost per rebalancing: $10,000
Annual savings: $160,000
Protocol distributes 1M reward tokens to community
Community members:
- Receive rewards in protocol token
- Want to convert to stablecoins
- Without MonBridge: Manual, high slippage
- With MonBridge: Automatic optimal execution
Community value:
- Rewards actually reach users intact
- Better experience with protocol
- Increased retention
Current Global DeFi Volume: $500B+ annually
MonBridge TAM: 20-30% of DEX volume = $100-150B
Fee Model: 0.1% of volume
Potential Annual Revenue: $100-150M
Year 1 Target: 1% market share = $1-1.5B volume
Year 1 Revenue: $1-1.5M
Year 3 Target: 10% market share = $10-15B volume
Year 3 Revenue: $10-15M
Retail Traders: 40% of volume
└─ Primary value: Simplicity and guaranteed best price
Institutional Traders: 35% of volume
└─ Primary value: Cost reduction at scale
Protocol Developers: 15% of volume
└─ Primary value: Integration and automation
Market Making/LPs: 10% of volume
└─ Primary value: Efficiency and capital optimization
User: "I have 1000 USDC, want DAI"
Without MonBridge:
1. Check Uniswap rate
2. Check Curve rate
3. Check Sushiswap rate
4. Manually choose best venue
5. Execute on chosen venue
(Takes 10+ minutes, high friction)
With MonBridge:
1. User specifies: 1000 USDC → DAI
2. MonBridge automatically finds best rate
3. Executes optimal trade
(Takes 2 minutes, smooth experience)
Monthly volume: 100,000 USDC
Without MonBridge: Average slippage 0.5% = $500 monthly loss
With MonBridge: Average slippage 0.1% = $100 monthly loss
Savings: $400/month from reduced slippage
Even accounting for 0.1% fee = $100
Net savings: $300/month (7.5% of volume)
Trade: 100M USDC → DAI
Without MonBridge:
- Single venue: ~5% slippage = $5M loss
- Manual splitting: Complex, time-consuming
With MonBridge:
- Automatic optimal split across 4 venues
- Average slippage: 0.3% = $300K loss
- Savings: $4.7M per trade
Daily trades: 100
Daily savings: $470M
Annual savings: $117.5B
Portfolio Rebalancing: Move positions across tokens
Traditional: Manual routing through best venues = 0.5% cost
MonBridge: Automatic optimal routing = 0.1% cost
Per rebalancing savings: 0.4% of volume
Annual rebalancing: $1B portfolio
Annual savings: $4M
Strategy: USDC → ETH → SHIB → LINK → USDC (arbitrage loop)
Without MonBridge:
Manual path analysis:
- USDC → ETH direct vs USDC → DAI → ETH
- ETH → SHIB direct vs ETH → USDC → SHIB
- Etc.
Hours of analysis required, complex
With MonBridge:
- Specify: USDC → SHIB → LINK → USDC
- MonBridge calculates optimal path
- Executes automatically
- Seconds instead of hours
MonBridge integrates multiple venues
Users access Protocol X through MonBridge
When Protocol X has best pricing for a trade pair:
- User routed through Protocol X
- Protocol X gets volume
- Better execution incentivizes users
Result: Win-win partnership
DApp Code:
import { MonBridgeRouter } from 'monbridge-sdk'
async function userSwap(inputToken, outputToken, amount) {
const route = await MonBridgeRouter.findBestRoute(
inputToken,
outputToken,
amount
)
return await executeSwap(route)
}
Benefits:
- One integration covers all DEX venues
- Automatic optimization
- Reduced development time
- Reliable, audited code
Migration: Ethereum → Polygon
1. User has USDC on Ethereum
2. Bridge to Polygon (loses time/cost)
3. Needs better pricing on Polygon
With MonBridge on both chains:
- Best Ethereum exit pricing
- Optimal route to USDC on Polygon
- Seamless migration experience
MonBridge's routing algorithm:
1. Queries all integrated venues
2. If Emerging DEX has best price
3. Routes volume there automatically
Result:
- Without MonBridge: 100 users
- With MonBridge: 1000+ users routed to venue when optimal
- Volume increases 10x purely from algorithmic routing
Mechanism: Quality attracts volume through aggregation
Traditional aggregator: "Use our custom routing (biased toward affiliates)"
MonBridge: "Pure algorithmic routing to best price"
For established DEX:
- If they have best price: Get volume
- If they don't: Routed to better venue
- Competition on quality not politics
Result: Establishes DEX as reliable venue
Attracts quality-conscious traders
Without MonBridge:
- Uniswap gets 100K swaps daily
- Curve gets 50K swaps daily
- Sushiswap gets 30K swaps daily
(Fragmented liquidity)
With MonBridge:
- Best prices for each pair routed to highest-liquidity venue
- Venues with better pricing get more volume
- Incentivizes LP participation
LP Benefit:
- Better venues attract more capital (better returns)
- Capital efficiency improved through aggregation
Capital allocation strategy:
- Allocate 50% to high-fee-tier Uniswap V3 (volatile pairs)
- Allocate 30% to Curve (stablecoin pairs)
- Allocate 20% to Sushiswap (alternative tokens)
MonBridge routing:
- Routes trades to venues where LP has positioned capital
- LP earns fees proportional to capital deployed
- Algorithmic routing rewards quality positioning
Result: LP earns fees from better capital allocation
Volatile Market Scenario:
Volatility spikes rapidly
Slippage limit set to 1% becomes obsolete
MonBridge handles:
1. Dynamic slippage calculation
2. Impact-responsive pricing
3. TWAP validation
4. Automatic split execution
User feels safe: "MonBridge will protect me"
Rebalancing: Move $50M across 5 tokens
Fractional execution:
- Split each leg across optimal venues
- Execute rebalancing over multiple blocks
- Minimize market impact
- Transparent price improvement tracking
Cost reduction: 2% → 0.2% slippage
On-chain transaction data from MonBridge:
- Every swap: (input, output, venue, slippage, price impact)
- 100% transparent historical record
- Queryable by anyone
Research possibilities:
- Pricing efficiency across venues
- Market maker behavior
- Volatility patterns
- Flash loan attack detection
Value: Public research infrastructure
Infrastructure use:
- Validators routing user swaps
- Need best-price aggregation for users
- MonBridge provides public good
Incentive alignment:
- Better execution = happier users
- Happier users = more fees to infrastructure
- Virtuous cycle
Treasury: 100,000 tokens across 10 types
Quarterly rebalancing needed
Without MonBridge:
Manual routing: 0.5% slippage cost
Cost per rebalancing: $50,000
Annual cost: $200,000
With MonBridge:
Automatic routing: 0.1% slippage
Cost per rebalancing: $10,000
Annual savings: $160,000
Protocol distributes 1M reward tokens to community
Community members:
- Receive rewards in protocol token
- Want to convert to stablecoins
- Without MonBridge: Manual, high slippage
- With MonBridge: Automatic optimal execution
Community value:
- Rewards actually reach users intact
- Better experience with protocol
- Increased retention
Current Global DeFi Volume: $500B+ annually
MonBridge TAM: 20-30% of DEX volume = $100-150B
Fee Model: 0.1% of volume
Potential Annual Revenue: $100-150M
Year 1 Target: 1% market share = $1-1.5B volume
Year 1 Revenue: $1-1.5M
Year 3 Target: 10% market share = $10-15B volume
Year 3 Revenue: $10-15M
Retail Traders: 40% of volume
└─ Primary value: Simplicity and guaranteed best price
Institutional Traders: 35% of volume
└─ Primary value: Cost reduction at scale
Protocol Developers: 15% of volume
└─ Primary value: Integration and automation
Market Making/LPs: 10% of volume
└─ Primary value: Efficiency and capital optimization